Difference between revisions of "Talk:Best of DC 33"
From Legion Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchCraigopher (talk | contribs) (Thanks for the fix) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I deleted the "Great Darkness" stuff because it wasn't true. According to the GCD [http://www.comics.org/covers.lasso?SeriesID=2493], Legion themed issues were no more common in this series during the Great Darkness than any other theme. The previous Legion issue was 24, and the next was 44. This was also a Secret Origins issue, not merely a "first appearances" issue, so I took that out too (despite the back cover blurb). Which reminds me - we should do front and back covers when they're wraparounds. -- [[User:Mgrabois|Omnicom]] 06:54, 22 January 2007 (PST) | I deleted the "Great Darkness" stuff because it wasn't true. According to the GCD [http://www.comics.org/covers.lasso?SeriesID=2493], Legion themed issues were no more common in this series during the Great Darkness than any other theme. The previous Legion issue was 24, and the next was 44. This was also a Secret Origins issue, not merely a "first appearances" issue, so I took that out too (despite the back cover blurb). Which reminds me - we should do front and back covers when they're wraparounds. -- [[User:Mgrabois|Omnicom]] 06:54, 22 January 2007 (PST) | ||
| + | :Corrections duly noted. Thanks! I plan to add the back cover scans for the digests as I did with Adv 500. Quite a few of them were wraparounds. Due to the square binding, I doubt I'll be able to get a true wraparound image, but we can at least have front and back views. -- [[User:Craigopher|Gopher]] 08:07, 22 January 2007 (PST) | ||
Latest revision as of 09:07, 22 January 2007
I deleted the "Great Darkness" stuff because it wasn't true. According to the GCD [1], Legion themed issues were no more common in this series during the Great Darkness than any other theme. The previous Legion issue was 24, and the next was 44. This was also a Secret Origins issue, not merely a "first appearances" issue, so I took that out too (despite the back cover blurb). Which reminds me - we should do front and back covers when they're wraparounds. -- Omnicom 06:54, 22 January 2007 (PST)
- Corrections duly noted. Thanks! I plan to add the back cover scans for the digests as I did with Adv 500. Quite a few of them were wraparounds. Due to the square binding, I doubt I'll be able to get a true wraparound image, but we can at least have front and back views. -- Gopher 08:07, 22 January 2007 (PST)
